studentloandefault.org

← Back to 523(a)(8) discharge trends

"v. United States" (no agency in caption)

Adversary proceedings under 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(8) where the case caption matches this servicer or agency. Source: CourtListener / RECAP archive (Free Law Project), v2 broader matcher snapshot 2026-04-28.

Total APs
32
Pre-DOJ guidance
18
Post-DOJ guidance
14

Filter: All Pre-DOJ (18) Post-DOJ (14)

Case nameCourtFiledTerminatedEra
McClimans v. United States Of America Acting Through the US Dewawb2025-11-19post
Breunig v. United States Of America Acting Through the US Dewawb2025-10-03post
DeHart v. United States Of America Acting Through the US Dewawb2025-08-13post
Olson v. United States Of America Acting Through the US Dewawb2025-07-30post
Ashford-Whitfield v. United States Of America Acting Through the US Dewawb2025-07-14post
Christianson v. United States Of America Acting Through the US Dewawb2025-07-11post
Stone v. United States of America (Internal Revenue Servicencwb2025-04-04post
Shearer v. United States Of America Acting Through the US Dewawb2024-11-082025-06-10post
Willie v. United States Of America Acting Through the US Dewawb2024-11-082025-09-09post
Pelroy v. United States Of America Acting Through the US Dewawb2024-11-012025-06-03post
Calvin v. United States Of America Acting Through the US Dewawb2024-09-10post
Marquez v. United Statescanb2023-02-092025-02-21post
Brown v. United Statesvawb2023-01-222023-04-25post
Perry v. United States Attorney Generalokwb2023-01-192024-04-29post
Stein v. United Stateskywb2022-03-012024-12-05pre
Martin v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, by and through its agencganb2022-02-142024-02-29pre
Walker v. United States of America (DoEd)mieb2021-09-212022-03-22pre
Cheney v. United States Of America (IRS)mab2021-08-042022-03-21pre
Harper v. United States of America, Acting by and Through thmab2020-06-232022-04-27pre
Kober v. United States Attorney for the District of Kansasksb2020-05-192020-09-22pre
Andrus v. United States Small Business Administrationlawb2020-04-292020-08-13pre
Davis v. United States of America, on behalf of its agencygamb2017-08-142018-11-08pre
Beech v. United Statesflmb2016-12-242018-02-23pre
Clark v. United States Internal Revenue Serviceganb2016-08-172019-04-09pre
White v. United States of America (IRS)ksb2011-02-082012-05-08pre
Rossman v. United Statesmab2011-01-052013-03-28pre
Varner v. United States of America (IRS)iasb2009-09-292011-07-25pre
Stone-Frye v. United Statesohnb2008-12-042010-03-05pre
Arroyo v. United Statesmab2008-05-082012-05-09pre
Mitchell v. United States of America/Internal Revenue Servicegamb2008-01-282011-05-10pre
Simone v. United Statesilcb2006-07-052007-10-10pre
Gonzalez Dixon v. United Statesnjb2004-10-082005-11-30pre

How this servicer is matched

A row is included when the AP's caseName matches one of these case-insensitive patterns:

\bv\.\s+united states\b(?!.*department)(?!.*education) \bv\.\s+united states of america\b(?!.*department)(?!.*education)

An AP can match more than one servicer (multi-defendant captions), so totals across servicers exceed the dataset's 2,045 records. The DOJ-guidance cutoff is November 17, 2022.